Newspapers’ photo-finish sanctions
Newspaper photographs should be accurate. Readers know that. So do photographers, photo editors and managing editors.
But what should a news organization do when a photojournalist’s work is less than accurate – or not completely truthful? When the Sacramento (Calif.) Bee discovered earlier this year that Bryan Patrick’s page one nature photo was actually a compilation of two photos, the newspaper suspended the award-winning photojournalist. Was suspension the right response of the newspaper, or was the Los Angeles Times correct when it fired Brian Walski in 2003 when he also merged two war-front photos to create a more dramatic image?
