New statehouse bureau aims to fill gap in coverage for Illinois newspapers

Like many statehouse press corps, the one in Illinois is a fraction of what it used to be. Since the legislative session started this year, about a dozen reporters, including interns, have been assigned to cover what’s going on in the Illinois capital. A decade ago, there were 30 full-time statehouse press reporters in Springfield and even more on session days.

It’s loss that is lamented and felt in nearly every newsroom in Illinois, from the smallest weeklies to the major daily newspapers in Chicago. Even the capital-city paper hasn’t been spared. On May 10, Angie Muhs, the executive editor of the State Journal-Register, resigned, leaving the Springfield paper without a top editor. The newspaper, owned by Gatehouse Media, already had laid off its photo and sports editors. It now has just six news reporters.

Jeff Rogers tried hard to figure out how to address this gap in state government coverage when he was editor of the Sterling Telegraph and Daily Gazette in northern Illinois. But he couldn’t make the math work. His two biggests costs at the Shaw Media publications he edited were personnel and newsprint, and he was already stretched thin.

Now he has.

Rogers is the inaugural bureau chief of the new Capitol News Illinois, an initiative of the Illinois Press Foundation, the charitable arm of the Illinois Press Association. The service, which launched on Jan. 28, provides free statehouse coverage to its more than 400 members. Including Rogers, there are four full-time staff members at the bureau, as well as two interns from the public affairs journalism program at the University of Illinois at Springfield.

The Capitol News Illinois team talks about coverage plans for the day in their office in the basement of the Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. Pictured, from left, are Grant Morgan, Rebecca Anzel, Peter Hancock, Jeff Rogers and Jerry Nowicki. Rogers is the bureau chief; Anzel, Hancock and Nowicki are full-time reporters; and Morgan is a full-time reporting intern from the Public Affairs Reporting program at University of Illinois Springfield.
(Photo by Lee Milner of Illinois Times)

“I am thrilled to have this new service,” said Jeannette Brickner, executive editor of the Times New Group in Central Illinois, which publishes papers the Pekin Daily Times, Chillicothe Times-Bulletin, East Peoria Times-Courier,, Morton Times-News, Washington Times-Reporter and Woodford Times. “In today’s times with very small newsroom staffs, we need all of the help we can get. We do use Associated Press stories, but Capitol News really focuses on what’s going on in our state regarding politics and more. These are the stories that will resonate with our readers, and the Capitol News team is producing a good amount and variety.”

Since its launch, more than 300 Illinois papers have published Capitol News Illinois content (nearly 7,000 stories), including the Chicago Sun-Times and suburban Daily Herald. Of those, 255 were weeklies, publications that historically have never had much, if any, statehouse coverage, said Sam R.  Fisher, president and chief executive of the Illinois Press Association. “The good thing is that weeklies are running this content,” Fisher said. “We didn’t know the extent the weeklies would embrace this. That is content that is being delivered to readers who haven’t seen that kind of state content before.”

Readers of the Springfield paper were used to that kind of comprehensive coverage of state government. But it is now stretched too thin and it shares its statehouse reporter with other papers in the Gatehouse chain. The Journal-Register has published dozens of stories from the Capital News Illinois bureau, including articles on health care reform, funding for state colleges and universities and sports gambling.

John Homan, managing editor of the Southern Illinois Local Media Group, which publishes the Marion Republican and the Du Quoin Call, said he has welcomed the state news coverage.

“While I have never supported national news in small publications like ours, state news not only helps us fill space but informs,” said Homan, whose papers have published stories on proposed legislation to remove toxic coal ash pits and renewable energy. “It’s relevant because it’s our state.”

The bureau has mostly focused on committee hearings and proposed legislation before it makes it to the floor for a vote, Rogers said. Recent stories included coverage of a proposal to legalize sports betting and a bill to ban for-profit immigration detention centers. The bureau also covered a brief visit to the capitol grounds by Stormy Daniels, the adult entertainment star who said she had an affair with President Trump. Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, joined a group of demonstrators in March to protest the “pole tax” on adult entertainment venues.

“Too often, local readers focus on just their community and don’t pay attention to what’s happening even in the next city over sometimes,” said Tim Rosenberger, managing editor of the Pekin Daily Times. “For them to know what’s going on in their state capitol — what laws are being passed, what’s being considered, and the general direction their state is going in — is crucial, because what’s happening there will affect them. So, I enjoy giving readers a look at all the big and small things going on in Springfield.”

Rosenberger said he usually run stories that will impact his Central Illinois readers in some way. “I didn’t use a recent Capitol News story that I believe had to do with the Chicago school board, because that doesn’t really affect people here,” he said. “But I will include stories about voting and smoking age, college and health policy, immigration, etc. Those are the types of stories that are relevant to them.”

The news bureau staff shares office space with the Daily Law Bulletin and Illinois Times in the basement of the capitol building. The space is overseen by the Illinois Correspondents Association.

Capitol News Illinois has provided its coverage even though its reporters were denied press credentials from both the Illinois House and Senate because the Illinois Press Association is a registered lobbying organization. That doesn’t mean the bureau cannot cover the statehouse, but it’s harder to do so without official credentials.

Illinois is hardly the only state with fewer reporters on the statehouse beat. A Pew Center research study five years ago found that less than a third of all U.S. newspapers assigned a reporter, full-time or part-time, to their statehouse. Nearly 90 percent of local TV stations did not assign anyone. It’s undoubtedly even fewer today.

Rogers is hopeful that the bureau could ultimately serve as a model for other state press associations.

“It was relatively easy to set up and relatively inexpensive,” he said. “We’re able to do all of this. It’s really a cost-effective. The need that’s here in Illinois is everywhere.”

A version of this story first appeared in Publisher’s Auxiliary, the only national publication serving America’s community newspapers. It is published by the National Newspaper Association. GJR is partnering with Pub Aux to re-print Jackie Spinner’s monthly “Local Matters” column on our website. Spinner is the editor of Gateway Journalism Review. Follow her on Twitter @jackiespinner.

‘Unpacking Segregation’ panelists examine how journalists shape Black Chicago’s narrative

Media coverage of violence on the Chicago’s south and west sides is both a symptom and a factor in Chicago’s historic segregation, and one with political and social ramifications felt across the city. In the national media, Chicago is a poster child for “black on black violence,” a one-sided framing of violent crime in disinvested and segregated areas of the country even though the city’s murder rate is far from the highest in the country or even the Midwest.


From left to right: Moderator Kristin Taylor, panelists Natalie Moore, Lucy Baird, David Schalliol, Deborah Payne, Carlos Javier Ortiz and Tonika Johnson.

At a recent panel discussion in Chicago on segregation, Chicago journalist Natalie Moore succinctly summed up the issue like this: “It’s like paint by numbers,” said Moore, a WBEZ public radio reporter and a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times. “Yellow tape. A neighbor. Somebody crying … You know what the story is.”

For Moore and other journalists in Chicago, it can be a struggle to break through the dominant media narrative about the city’s predominantly black and Hispanic south and west sides, which are often covered in terms of gun violence and crime that occur there. While stories like the ones Moore described may offer a convenient template for news coverage, the proliferation of crime reporting in lieu of deeper analysis of the driving forces behind it can create a stereotypical narrative of some of the city’s most storied and vulnerable neighborhoods. That narrative contributes to the continued segregation of the city itself.

Moore has written and spoken extensively about how this singular media narrative has shaped the way Chicagoans, both in and outside of the affected areas, see their city, how it’s affected the distribution of resources to these neighborhoods and the creation of policies that shape them.

“When unraveling the impact and implications of Chicago violence, we fail to recognize that the media have played a role in contributing to the narrative,” Moore wrote in her 2017 book, “The South Side: A Portrait of Chicago and American Segregation.” “We become what we think we are. Chicagoans are time and time again fed how violent we are, and many people internalize that cognitive belief. The perception of crime is higher than the reality. From the mob to gangs, violence has percolated through the streets of Chicago for the past hundred years. The city has seen it all before; there’s nothing new under the sun. We just don’t remember.”

Although a May 2 panel discussion at the Museum of Contemporary Photography in Chicago aimed to provide a broad overview of segregation in the city, covering the Great Migration to the modern mechanisms of disinvestment in Chicago’s black and brown communities, it only took 30 minutes into the discussion for a panel of activists and journalists (Moore was one of them) to turn its attention to the media’s role.

When violent crimes happen, “this is the only time you see a lot of news organizations come into these neighborhoods,” Moore said. “So it perpetuates stereotypes and it becomes this singular narrative.”

Other panelists  included Carlos Javier Ortiz, a cinematographer and photographer; Tonika Johnson, a local artist whose Folded Map project explores Chicago’s racial and economic divide;  David Schalliol, a photographer and documentarian; Deborah Payne, an activist in Englewood who is one of the subjects of Schalliol’s recent documentary, “The Area;” and Lucy Baird, a historian focused on housing discrimination. The panel was moderated by Kristin Taylor, at the museum.

Many on the city’s south side share Moore’s concern about how media coverage of their neighborhood can shape the perception of it, even for its residents.

“The same negative narrative that everyone knows about Englewood is shared through the media. That’s also the same narrative that residents in Englewood actually get,” said Johnson, an Englewood native. “Honestly it comes down to the fact that the media is not a place of information for us. There’s an information deficit. So people rely on the news to find out things about their city, about their neighborhood, but when you’re from a neighborhood that’s just reported one way, where do you go? What do you do?”

As well as creating art to highlight the inequity felt on Chicago’s south side, Johnson joined the Resident Association of Greater Englewood, of which Payne is also a member. RAGE was one of the first organizations to host aldermanic forums in the Englewood neighborhood where, before, according to Johnson, incumbent aldermen could expect to keep winning re-election regardless of how their votes affected the parts of the neighborhood they represented. (Aldermen in Chicago represent the city’s 50 wards and serve on the City Council).

RAGE also helped Johnson attain funding to rent billboards in Englewood which were plastered with celebratory photographs taken by Johnson throughout the neighborhood. The billboards, Johnson says, were another way to fight the dominant narrative, to help the residents in Englewood feel proud of where they live.

Moore and Ortiz recalled working for a native Chicagoan editor at Ebony who charged them with writing a slice-of-life story in the Roseland neighborhood in Chicago. The pair spent 48 hours in the neighborhood, from Friday to Sunday. Neither remembered seeing any violence.

The ramifications of racial and economic segregation are too numerous to list. A select few discussed in the panel include the negative impacts on public schools, forced relocations, economic impacts for the greater city (One study by the Metropolitan Planning Council that found segregation is costing Chicago an estimated 4.4 billion a year)in addition to  and, of course, the emotional toll it can have on people living in disinvested neighborhoods.

“We see time and time again one of the consequences of segregation is the way that all these kinds of factors get amplified,” Schalliol said. “We know there are real problems that emerge when people are segregated based on class. We know there are real problems when people are segregated based on race. When the two of those things come together, it becomes just absolutely disastrous.”

Panelists also highlighted the good work being done on the south and west sides by many journalists in Chicago. Johnson pointed to the works of newer, hyperlocal outlets like City Bureau and The Triibe, as well as legacy outlets like the Chicago Reporter and WBEZ.

“The good thing about working at WBEZ is that we can choose a little bit more what we do,” Moore said. “You know, there are a lot of news outlets, which is a good thing. But also our audience, if they heard shootings and that kind of round-up coverage, they will call – I mean, they have called – and say ‘that’s not why I’m a member of WBEZ. I can turn on the TV for that.”

Ortiz added, “There’s so many stories out there that you can, if you’re a journalist, you can go cover that nobody’s covering. Just go out and do it and open our eyes to it.”

Work from both Ortiz and Schalliol is on display at the museum in the city’s South Loop through July 7. They offer intimate looks at life on Chicago’s south side.

Ian Karbal is Chicago-based freelance journalist. He can be found on Twitter at @iankarbal.

Two departing Post-Dispatch copy editors bid farewell

Jennie Crabbe and Colleen Schrappen finished their last shifts on the St. Louis Post-Dispatch copy desk on May 1, signing off on Twitter and in an email to colleagues. Lee Enterprises announced in February that it was eliminating the copy desk and moving copy and design functions to Indiana.

Jennie Crabbe, Lisa Eisenhauer and Colleen Schrappen sit together in the Post-Dispatch newsroom on one of their final weeks before the copy desk was eliminated.

Avis Meyer, a veteran of the copy desk recently wrote about the layoffs for GJR, noting that since Lee bought the Post-Dispatch in 2005, executives “have been sloughing off accomplished journalists, writers and copy editors, helter-skelter, like a pine tree shedding cones in a hurricane. And they’re still at it.”

Here are the notes Crabbe and Schrappen sent on their last day:

Pulling on a vital strand of journalistic fabric

Copy editors are not proofreaders. We are not fact-checkers or headline writers. And, despite the prevalence of decisions that seem to contradict this: We are not expendable.

We are journalists – as integral to any news organization as reporters, photographers and managing editors.

Eliminating the copy desk is like pulling at a strand on a sweater. It creates a hole that leaves the surrounding strands frayed and vulnerable. You can try to patch it, but the fabric has been weakened. The gape will be noticed.

****

Most copy desks punch above their weight, holding their own even through terrible losses. That may not be noticed, because when we do our job right, what we do is barely detectable.

But make no mistake, our thumbprints are on every story.

In every tightened sentence.

In every fixed first reference.

In every inviting headline.

In the captions, graphics and sidebars. The special sections. The front-page cohesion.

We cut through the clutter, alleviate confusion, do away with redundancies. We ensure language is inclusive, free of bias and respectful of differences. We do the math, look things up, get it right.

For our colleagues. For our readers. For our own peace of mind.

We apologize to reporters when we phone them in order to fix their mistakes. We get dismissed by editors when we ask them questions – which is, of course, our job.

We come in when we are sick, because there is no one to cover for us. We work nights and weekends and we miss events with our friends and families because, well, there is no one to cover for us. Ever.

We tear everything up, start over and stay late when Red Schoendienst dies. Or Phyllis Schlafly. George Bush. Muhammad Ali. Deadline-pushers, each of them, in every sense of the word.

When an email goes out thanking the staff for work well done, we are not mentioned by name. We are often not mentioned at all.

And that’s OK.

Because we also get to supply the Weatherbird’s quips. We write the headlines that sing. We make the saves that no one else will ever know about. We work with the funniest, smartest, most helpful people in the newsroom.

We throw Friday night fests, debate the latest changes to AP style and dissect the plots and protagonists that propagate the news cycle. We’re not shy about being a little off-color. Or a lot off-color. Ahem.

****

We are part of something big and important. What we do as copy editors matters. Journalism matters.

And in this terrible moment for the profession, I am still proud to call myself a journalist. The newsroom is my favorite place to be.

I love the news. I love being a copy editor. And I will always be grateful to have been a strand in that journalistic fabric.

Colleen Schrappen

Newsroom is a place for misfits

To my Post-Dispatch family:

I got to reflect a bit on my career three years ago when I was asked to speak at the retirement dinner at St. Louis U. for Avis Meyer. I wrote a little speech that I cheekily titled: “A Life in Newspapers, and Other Dumb Ideas.”  A couple of you might have been there to hear it… Here’s a relevant (and updated) excerpt:

——————————————

A newsroom is a place for misfits, and every one I’ve been in — or heard about — is the same. Smart, passionate — sometimes grating — individuals, butting heads, but all pulling for a common goal. Delivering the product to the driveway — or now, the screen — and getting the glorious chance to start fresh the next day and do it all again.

A front-row seat to history.

Sometimes that front-row seat puts you a little too close to the action. You see the worst of humanity, and it steals something from you.

Oklahoma City. Columbine. 9/11. Cookie Thornton. The Boston Marathon. Sandy Hook. Ferguson. Je Suis Paris.

And I’ve had to sit there, white-knuckled, watching some of the best people I’ve ever known get tapped on the shoulder and escorted from the building. (Not to mention all those buyouts… let’s just say that “farewell” cake stopped tasting good about two dozen cakes ago.)

But on the best days, you get to share in the joy of a colleague, of a family. Of a city. Of the world.

The turn of the millennium. The Missouri Miracle. The Mars rovers. Marriage for all.

11 division titles. 4 NL pennants. 2 world championships. The late lamented Greatest Show on Turf.

And two Pulitzer Prizes.

On the best days, you feel a part of something bigger, like you’ve touched — and told — the truth.

——————————————

So, dumb idea or not, I’ve got no regrets. I’m just sorry I won’t be here to share in the great work that I know you’ll do for years to come.

Take care of each other.

Stay drastically independent.

And keep kicking ass.

Jennie Crabbe

Lee’s pricing model for ‘members’ alienates longtime readers

At almost 77, my Midwestern mother has a complicated relationship with her local newspaper. For more than half her life, she’s been a daily subscriber. When she goes on vacation, she has a neighbor save the papers for her so she can go through them upon her return. She clips out obituaries and articles about people she knows in the Central Illinois town where I grew up.

So it pained me to hear that she’s cancelled her print newspaper subscription. As of May, my mom became a digital-only subscriber for $12 a month, a promotional rate that will increase to $18 a month unless she calls to negotiate when it expires, which I know she will. Her decision–and the reason behind it, exemplifies where we’re at in the news business. It’s also a lesson for publishers in how better to communicate with long-time readers. If we can’t get it right, local journalism isn’t going to survive.

For my mom, it started with a letter, although her irritation with the Decatur Herald & Review has been growing as it’s become smaller, the customer service representatives answer the phone from a different city and the printing operations moved out of town, meaning the late sports scores are no longer included in the final print edition.

I’ve tried to explain the business of this to her, noting that newsprint costs have increased even as advertising revenue has continued to fall. We’ve had long talks about how the Internet has disrupted the business model that sustained newspapers for the decades she has been reading them, and she listens politely, but the bottom line is her own bottom line as a senior on a fixed income. Her newspaper will cost her an additional $13 a month more when Lee Enterprises, which owns the Herald & Review, moves to a new subscriber model.

The letter she received in early March thanked her for supporting quality, local journalism. And it is. Last year the Herald & Review exposed a $2.7 million cost overrun in a dredging project on Lake Decatur that was being billed to the taxpayers. Using Freedom of Information requests, the paper discovered that the contractor and a project consultant blamed each other for a mistake that led to the additional expense.

The letter didn’t mention that story, only that Herald & Review was moving to a “membership” model for subscribers. It was signed, impersonally, by the “Customer Service Department.”

A  few days after getting the letter, my mom went out to lunch with some old high school friends. She reported back to me that the newspaper increase was the “No. 1 topic” of conversation. What irritated her and her friends most is that each of them seemed to be paying a different amount. My mom said she didn’t disclose the bargain price she had negotiated, which was far less than most of her friends.

“At another luncheon Luella sat next to me talking about the paper, and  she got it Sunday through Saturday and was paying $60 a month,” Mom relayed to me after I deputized her to do some additional reporting for me. “Julie lives in Springfield and pays $178 for 13 weeks. Bev was going to call them that afternoon. Phyllis was going to check with Dick on the bill.” A longtime friend told Mom that at her beauty shop, “my gal told me that people were cancelling right and left.”

I assured my mom that I’d get to the bottom of this. After all, I’m a journalist and former business reporter for The Washington Post. I searched the quarterly investor reports from Lee Enterprises for news about the new membership model but didn’t find much. This is not something my mother would have done or known how to do, which is why journalism exists. We pour through documents, show up at meetings, ask questions, demand that our elected politicians be accountable to us and to our readers and viewers, the taxpayers. We do this on behalf of the communities we serve, and many of us need to do a better job of explaining this to our readers.

I reached out to Tracy Rouch, director of public relations for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the flagship newspaper in the Lee Enterprises chain. I congratulated her on the paper’s recent win after Tony Messenger won the 2019 Pulitzer Prize for commentary.

“This is handled at the corporate level and wanted to make sure I pass it along to the person who handles their interview requests, Charles Arms,” Rouch wrote back to me in an email. “I just heard back from him (as he was out on vacation this week) and he said since they just launched the program, they are not prepared to comment at this time.”

I went back to my mom to find out if she’d learned anything more from “Dani,” the customer service representative with whom she’d been communicating since the letter arrived in the mail.

“That’s one thing I shared with Dani in my first call with her a month ago is that I thought those price increases were impossible for many of the senior citizens who have supported the H&R all their lives and who are now living on a fixed income,” my mom told me. “I also feel bad for the carriers who are losing customers because people are just simply canceling the subscriptions–I mean memberships– because of the increase and because so many are realizing that they’ve been paying different amounts to the H&R for the same papers on the same days of the week. People talk and, when they find out that neighbors are paying different amounts for the same product, they get upset.”

Like many in her circle in the middle of the country, my mom has become more distrustful of news, buying into the narrative of “fake news” and rampant media bias. I’m one of the good ones because I’m her daughter, but she doesn’t really like journalists. She trusts us about as much as she trusts a solicitor trying to sell her something over the telephone. She retrieves her newspaper from the front stoop every morning but also reaches for her phone to check Facebook and turns on national cable news. I wonder if she will reach for the Herald & Review online in the same way. I wonder if the other subscribers, even the younger ones, will even bother.

I don’t know if the new membership model that Lee rolled out is the answer to this.  I simply don’t have enough information to say. (I tried, Mom). Public radio has long operated on membership drives and models, and journalism non-profits like City Bureau in Chicago rely on them. The $8-a-month bronze level Press Club membership at City Bureau is advertised as “the same price as Netflix, but for a stronger democracy,” a compelling pitch. But public radio and City Bureau are not profit-driven corporations; Lee is.

As someone who is deeply invested in this business as a journalist and a professor, I do think my mom is on to something when she tells me that she can’t understand how a company can sell a product to various people for such different prices.

That deserves an answer.

This story first appeared in Publisher’s Auxiliary, the only national publication serving America’s community newspapers. It is published by the National Newspaper Association. GJR is partnering with Pub Aux to re-print Jackie Spinner’s monthly “Local Matters” column on our website. Spinner is the editor of Gateway Journalism Review. Follow her on Twitter @jackiespinner.

How journalists can cover mass shootings with compassion, respect and still ask tough questions

Reporter Megan Jones of the Aurora Beacon-News was one of the first reporters on the scene of a mass shooting in Aurora in February. She had just finished interviewing a mother whose son was shot the month before when she heard an ambulance scream past on its way to the Henry Pratt Co. manufacturing plant where five people had been killed. Chicago Tribune reporter Stacy St. Clair was working from home one town over and headed to Pratt after seeing Jones’ tweet on the active shooter.

“We’re sister papers, and we work as a team,” said St. Clair, who had covered another mass shooting on Valentine’s Day 2008  at Northern Illinois University. Six people died that day.

It’s important for journalists to come together to discuss strategy and news judgment, said James Fuller, senior writer at the Daily Herald in Arlington Heights and president of the Northern Illinois Newspaper Association, based at the DeKalb campus. Widespread layoffs have drained newsrooms of veteran reporters who have been through this kind of breaking news coverage, he said.

Reporter Megan Jones of the Aurora Beacon-News (second from right) was one of the first reporters on the scene of a mass shooting in Aurora in February. Stacy St. Clair (far right) of the Chicago Tribune was working from home one town over and headed to Pratt after seeing Jones’ tweet on the active shooter. (Photo by Shonda Talerico Dudlicek)

“Part of the conversation was editors realizing on the day of the Pratt shooting that many of the folks they had on staff at the time of that NIU shooting were gone,” Fuller said. “So we thought it would be a good idea to pull together folks who covered the Pratt shooting, or experienced it, for some reflection on what went well and what didn’t go so well.”

Jones and St. Clair were two of the panelists at a seminar in April at Northern Illinois University. Other panelists were Anita Lewis, a 41-year Pratt employee and Aurora Police Sgt. Bill Rowley, whose first day on the job as the department’s public information officer was only days earlier.

“We realized we were not at all prepared for this. We had no active-shooter training,” Lewis said, adding she learned what was happening inside her own workplace from ABC News.

Rowley, who has hostage negotiation training, headed to the Pratt building that day. “Two who were shot were in my squad. Chief (Kristen) Ziman turned to me and told me to get back to the station, ‘The place is crawling with media, you need to handle this and tell them where they need to stage.’ I didn’t know the lingo. I knew APA in grad school, not AP. I had to find a way to get the media in one spot. My voicemail filled up in 12 minutes. I was not on Twitter until that day.”

Rowley said he was upfront about his lack of experience in dealing with the media. “It was important to get as much of the message out as we can. We did the best we could,” he said.

One of the hardest parts of the day was not only dealing with victims’ families but dealing with the national media, both Rowley and Lewis said.

“When I heard they camped outside of families’ homes and made their way in posing as pizza delivery people, I was furious,” Rowley said. “Local media was very understanding and helpful in a crisis. They wanted their story and they knew what we were facing.”

Rowley said he used the police department’s Facebook page but admitted he wished he had been more prepared on the front end. “It’s police first, media second.”

A lifelong Kane County resident, Lewis said local news reporters were respectful and others “were looking for the next big headline. I gave two interviews, to the Kane County Chronicle and the Aurora-Beacon News. The national media was horrible.”

Lewis questioned when Pratt would stop making the front page. “It’s really hard to heal. There was a coroner’s report a few days ago. It’s very hard for people to heal when you see on the front page that someone was shot five times in the head – sorry, those are my friends you’re talking about here. How long do you keep this in the public eye?”

She said the company’s owners put employees under a press gag order for the first 72 hours. “I didn’t talk to anyone I didn’t have a relationship with. It’s up to the police and FBI to find out what happened. It’s not up to me.”

But journalists also have a job to do.

“We’re all going to knock on doors,” St. Clair said. “No one wants to cause more harm. Are there more respectful ways to do this?”

Lewis said she wished reporters would let police and officials handle it in the beginning. “Call me after 24 hours. Say, ‘I know you’re an employee and you lost some friends.’ It’s hard on family members. Gary’s (Martin, the gunman who killed five, wounded six and was killed by police) family literally went through hell the first few days. It was hard on them. That’s their son, an uncle who played with their kids, a loner, yes, but still, that’s their son.”

She recalled those who attended the prayer vigil for the victims being asked by members of the national media, “Who are you, why are you there?”  

Biesk countered that mass shootings are a national story. “Presidential debates and campaigns discuss them. There can’t be this notion that something tragic happens and CNN isn’t going to cover it.”

Lewis suggested national outlets rely on the trusted local affiliates to get the story, similar to how hurricanes are covered.

St. Clair noted reporters “get really nervous when you’re doing this and sometimes what you say comes out wrong. They feel the pressure of the job and the sorrow and loss of the family.”

“I covered the shooting here at NIU and after 20 years it never gets easier,” St. Clair said. “No reporter enjoys that. I tell the victim’s family that yes, there will be a story in the paper tomorrow about how their father died. I want to explain how he lived and his loss to the community,” she said, referring to Vicente Juarez’s neighbors recalling “great stories of leading his subdivision’s war against dandelions.” After Juarez’s family saw the story online, relatives contacted St. Clair and were ready to talk.

Rowley was asked from a police perspective about the dumbest things that journalists did in this incident.

“The pizza delivery infuriated me. And there was another reporter who wanted me to know that she was a cop’s wife. She sends me emails once a week and ‘cop’s wife’ is in the subject. Let me tell you, if I get an email from the national media I’ll delete it, I don’t care,” Rowley said. “The media wants immediate and direct contact with officers but there were questions I couldn’t answer. The FOID card issue was with the state police, it’s not within our scope,” he said, referring to the revelation that Illinois State Police revoked Martin’s FOID card and rejected his concealed carry application but he still possessed a gun.

Rowley said the police department learned valuable lessons from that day. “Since Pratt, we’ve had meetings in the city and training set up through Homeland Security, training with fire and police department and share it with Naperville,” he said of the neighboring town. “Next time this happens it won’t be someone like me who’s in the fight. I’ll be doing my job somewhere else in the middle of it.” Rowley said a new Aurora PIO will be named.

Anne Halston, editor of three regional newspapers owned by the Chicago Tribune,was off work the day of the shootings at Pratt. She said saw on her official alert subscription service that there was an active shooter at Aurora University, not at a business in the industrial area. She said because the Aurora scanner system is encrypted it’s hard to get information.

Rowley recommended signing up for Everbridge or Nixle for alerts from local public safety agencies. “You’ll get cell phone alerts to your phone. We use Everbridge internally and we used it on a limited basis for Pratt. We now use Nixle and someone will be able to send out an alert.”

He outlined how the public can use Nixle to alert the police about incidents. “If you see a fight, shoot the video and upload it a Cloud service and we’ll know where to go.”

Rowley was asked if he thought media outlets should identify the gunman. “We said his name – one time – in the beginning. We don’t want it on our conscience that we encouraged someone. We’re not going to take up that flag. In law enforcement, this is a trend.”

Lewis saw it another way. “For me, his name was not glorifying what he did. I had known him for 15 years. His name is part of the story. His name will come out because of his record. We’re being naïve if we don’t think there are dark people in our world.”

Jones saw this case as different from those with random mass shooters. “This is a peculiar case. He had a relationship with these employees,” she said of the gunman. She mentioned the paper’s columnist, Denise Crosby, was going to write a eulogy column on how Martin was a hard worker, but ultimately decided not to write the story. “He had a record and history and we ran his mugshot the first couple of days, but let’s not keep running it,” Jones said. It was also the paper’s policy to refer to Martin as “the shooter.”

Lewis talked about an employee assistance meeting at Pratt in which someone said: “Let’s talk about the elephant in the room, Gary Martin.” Employees were crying but it was part of the healing process they all needed, she said.

“We need to talk about it. His name is going to get out there anyway. Aurora is a small town,” Lewis said.

St. Clair said she respects the police department’s decision to not name the gunman, but the incident led to flaws in the Illinois system being exposed. “It’s not my job to pretend bad things didn’t happen. He had a gun. There are lessons we can learn to prevent this. If we don’t tell Gary Martin’s story we don’t get that change.”

Follow-up reporting was based on Illinois State Police providing what St. Clair described as an unprecedented amount of documents. “Seventy eight percent of people don’t tell the state what they do with their guns,” she said. “Maybe that changes. If you learn mistakes, you need to shed light on this.”

Rowley and Lewis also said the Pratt incident brought about internal changes within their workplaces.

Lewis admitted that when law enforcement showed up that day they were entering buildings that they knew nothing about. Pratt will develop diagrams and floor plans to turn over to law enforcement, she said.

Rowley went one step further. “Because of Pratt, we’ve developed a plan to get schematics of every business to submit to us digitally,” he said. “That was one good thing that came out of this. And we’re going to get an updated contact list for every business.”

Upon hearing this, Beacon-News reporter Jones picked up her notebook, smiled and said, “Story!”

Shonda Talerico Dudlicek is a freelance journalist based in the Chicago suburbs who writes for the Chicago Tribune’s suburban publications, including the Aurora Beacon-News, and teaches journalism at Roosevelt and Dominican universities.

Editor’s Note: This story was corrected. Anne Halston is editor of three regional newspapers owned by the Chicago Tribune and a former editor of the Tribune‘s three other suburban dailies, including the Beacon-News..